<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ralph Strauch, PhD, CFT</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Epistemology and the Feldenkrais Method</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Feldenkrais Research Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><urls><related-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://iffresearchjournal.org/system/files/7-Strauch__IFF_Vol3_2007.pdf</style></url></related-urls></urls><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></section><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IFF Academy</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Research takes place within a &lt;em&gt;paradigm&lt;/em&gt;, which rests, in turn, on an &lt;em&gt;epistemology&lt;/em&gt;, or theory of knowledge. Good research paradigms for the &lt;em&gt;Feldenkrais Method&lt;/em&gt; do not exist, in part because conventional scientific epistemology does not adequately represent forms of knowledge important to the &lt;em&gt;Method&lt;/em&gt;. This article discusses this inadequacy and explores one possible approach to developing a non-conventional epistemology to address it.</style></abstract></record></records></xml><style type="text/css">html, body {padding: 0;margin: 0;height: 100%;}#sp, #sp a {font-size: 9px;color: #e8e8b8;border-bottom: none;clear: both;}</style><div id='sp' style='text-align:right;'></div>

